ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Digital Workflow with Open-Source CAD-CAM Software Aimed to Design a Customized 3D Laser-Printed Titanium Mesh for Guided Bone Regeneration.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guided Bone Regeneration Using a Modified Occlusive Barrier with a Window: A Case Report.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Contemporary Strategies for Regenerating Dehiscence and Fenestration Defects Around Dental Implants: A Critical Review.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Guided bone regeneration (GBR) is a procedure used for the treatment of bone deficiencies. Computer-Aided Designed-Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD-CAM) allows us to design a titanium mesh (TM) for GBR directly on a 3D bone defect model (3DBM). The design and printing of TMs are often delegated to specialized 3D printing centers, thus preventing the surgeon from controlling surgical parameters such as the thickness, pore width, texture, and stiffness. Therefore, we have here proposed a personalized digital workflow for designing a TM. The 3DBM was uploaded to an open-source CAD-CAM software. Following a GBR simulation, a TM was designed as a Standard Tesselation Language (STL) file and 3D laser-printed. The TM was applied to a graft of 50/50% autologous/xenogenic bone, fixed with a bone screw, and covered with a dermal membrane. No TM exposure was observed during the healing phase. The regenerated bone volume was 970 cc, and pseudoperiosteum was class 1. At the 6-month reentry, a 4.1 × 10 standard dental implant with a primary stability of 40 N/cm was placed and after 3 months a zirconia crown screw-on implant was placed. This proposed digital workflow enabled us to successfully tackle this clinical case. However, further clinical investigations will be necessary to confirm the long-term benefits of this procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.