Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40428044›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Reconciliation of Work and Personal Roles Among Critical Care Nurses: Constructivist Grounded Theory Research.

Miguel Valencia-Contrera, Lissette Avilés, Naldy Febré

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miguel Valencia-ContreraFaculty of Nursing, Andrés Bello University, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-4943-5924
Lissette AvilésNursing Studies Department, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0610-0665
Naldy FebréFaculty of Nursing, Andrés Bello University, Santiago 8370146, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-5801

Funding

National Agency for Research and Development, Ministry of Science, Technology, Knowledge, and Innovation of Chile 21231184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are numerous and varied theoretical gaps in the study of work-family interaction, which limits the understanding and approach to this phenomenon, especially among vulnerable groups such as critical care nursing professionals. In this regard, the objective of this study was to theorize the work-family interaction process among nurses working in Critical Care Units in Chile.

methodsConstructivist grounded theory was employed to conceptualize the phenomenon of interest from the perspectives of nurses, their families, and administrative staff. Data were collected through observations in two high-complexity hospitals in Chile, one public and one private; document analysis; and 51 in-depth interviews. Data analysis was conducted using constant comparisons and multi-level coding. To ensure rigor, the study followed the 13 criteria proposed by Charmaz and Thornberg for constructivist grounded theory studies and was approved by a Scientific Ethics Committee.

resultsThe reconciliation of work and personal roles emerged as the core process explaining the interaction between work and personal life among nurses in Critical Care Units. This complex and multidimensional process comprised three stages: resisting the war of roles, hitting rock bottom, and reconciling, through which nurses attempt to achieve balance between work and personal roles.

conclusionsWe developed a theory that explains the work-family interaction process. The theory developed highlights the importance of an integrated approach that considers both sources of conflict and reconciliation strategies. Addressing this phenomenon effectively requires interventions at the individual, organizational, and public policy levels.

Indexed as

grounded theoryintensive care unitsnursingqualitative researchwork–life balance

Identifiers

PMID40428044
PMCPMC12111176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.