Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427864›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Socioeconomic Deprivation and Opioid Consumption: An Analysis Across England.

Sara Appleby, Othman Al Musaimi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara ApplebySchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-5255-2466
Othman Al MusaimiSchool of Pharmacy, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2421-1825

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Concerns sparked by the US opioid epidemic have led to increased attempts to reduce England's overall opioid consumption. Variations in health literacy across the country have led to differing prescribing practices, with increased chronic conditions appearing in areas of increased socioeconomic deprivation. This review investigated the relationship between increased opioid utilization and increased socioeconomic deprivation, aiming to highlight areas of England which have the highest opioid consumption. The review has investigated a range of socioeconomic factors, such as unemployment and fuel poverty, which have consequently influenced the higher frequency of opioid prescribing in areas where these factors were highest. Opioid abuse was most prevalent in areas with higher levels of deprivation. Geographically, areas with the highest levels of deprivation, and consequent opioid consumption, were situated in the North of England, with cities like London having a significantly lower consumption rate in comparison. These trends are a good starting point when designing future opioid epidemic-prevention strategies, as specific areas can be targeted to propel a reduction in opioid prescribing and addiction and thus decrease the likelihood of an opioid crisis forming. Although a longitudinal study would have strengthened the findings of this review, it was not feasible due to practical constraints.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOpioid-Related DisordersPovertyEnglandHumansSocioeconomic FactorsAnalgesics, Opioidaddictiondeprivationopioidprescriptionsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID40427864
PMCPMC12110997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.