Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427826›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Foraging, Farming or Shopping? A Decision Matrix Approach for Food Environment Assessments.

Lilly Zeitler, Suwichan Phatthanaphraiwan, Shauna Downs, Bronwen Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lilly ZeitlerDepartment of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6771-188X
Suwichan PhatthanaphraiwanSchool of Liberal Arts, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai 57100, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0004-8267-6764
Shauna DownsDepartment of Health Behavior, Society and Policy, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Bronwen PowellDepartment of Geography, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8387-9804

Funding

National Science Foundation 2426690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food environments (the interfaces between consumers and the broader food system) shape dietary change and associated health outcomes. Characteristics of food environments (e.g., availability, accessibility, affordability, convenience, desirability) can influence consumer decision-making around food acquisition in different types of food environments (e.g., informal and formal markets, wild and cultivated natural environments). With the novel decision matrix approach presented in this paper, we aimed to develop a simple and rapid tool for collecting perceived evaluations and preferences of different types and characteristics of food environments. The decision matrix results were triangulated using a mixed methodology of geolocated participant observation, participatory mapping, market price comparisons and qualitative interviews. The decision matrix results were compared to the reported use of different food environment types in an Indigenous Pgaz K'Nyau community in Northern Thailand. Despite an ongoing food environment transition, participants preferred natural food environments and ranked market environments most poorly, largely reflecting actual food environment use. Interviewees stressed the importance of flavor and food safety, citing concerns over agrochemical contamination of market foods. The proposed decision matrix and mixed methods approach provides a rapid data collection method that can be used by food environment researchers and public health practitioners to assess food environment preferences and perceptions that influence decision-making in food environment transitions in low- and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

AgricultureConsumer BehaviorFood SupplyAdultCommerceDecision MakingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedThailandYoung Adultdecision-makingfood choicefood qualityfood sharingIndigenouslow-and-middle-income countriesmixed methodsmulti-criteria decision analysisparticipatory mappingwild foods

Identifiers

PMID40427826
PMCPMC12110889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.