Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427812›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Learning from COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the IHR-SPAR Framework's Role in the Pandemic Response.

Ida Santalucia, Michele Sorrentino, Claudio Fiorilla, Sabrina Tranquilli, Giordana Strazza, Paolo Montuori, Raffaele Palladino, Maria Fiore, Margherita Ferrante, Maria Triassi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ida SantaluciaDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Michele SorrentinoDepartment of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Claudio FiorillaDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3238-1103
Sabrina TranquilliDepartment of Economics, Law, Cybersecurity, and Sports Sciences, Parthenope University, 80133 Naples, Italy.
Giordana StrazzaDepartment of Political Science and Communication, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, Italy.
Paolo MontuoriDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Raffaele PalladinoDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-812X
Maria FioreDepartment of Medical Sciences, Surgical and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-9329
Margherita FerranteDepartment of Medical Sciences, Surgical and Advanced Technologies "G.F. Ingrassia", University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7596-2464
Maria TriassiDepartment of Public Health, University "Federico II" of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Health Regulations (IHR) provide a global framework for health security, requiring annual reporting on 35 indicators across 15 core capacities via the State Parties Annual Reporting (SPAR) tool. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed gaps in the IHR framework and monitoring systems, prompting calls for reform. This systematic review analyzed the correlations between IHR-SPAR scores and pandemic outcomes across nine studies (2020-2024), selected using the PRISMA guidelines. The study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's tool for cross-sectional studies. Of 1019 screened studies, nine met the inclusion criteria. Higher SPAR scores generally correlated with lower COVID-19 incidence and mortality, although some high-scoring countries experienced severe outbreaks. Middle-income countries showed the greatest improvement, particularly in risk communication and emergency response, while zoonotic disease capacities saw little progress. While the SPAR tool aids monitoring, it requires revisions to better reflect real-world pandemic responses. High SPAR scores do not always indicate effective crisis management. This study recommends integrating more dynamic, operational, and context-sensitive indicators to enhance the global preparedness for future health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Global HealthInternational Health RegulationsPandemicsHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19International Health Regulations (IHR)SPARsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40427812
PMCPMC12111758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.