Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427803›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Exploring How Rheumatic Fever Is Portrayed on TikTok: A Descriptive Content Analysis.

Siobhan Tu'akoi, Malakai Ofanoa, Samuela Ofanoa, Maryann Heather, Hinamaha Lutui, Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Gout, TikTok and misleading information: a content analysis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siobhan Tu'akoiPacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-1364
Malakai OfanoaPacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Samuela OfanoaPacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9880-7176
Maryann HeatherPacific Health Section, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.
Hinamaha LutuiSouthpoint Family Doctors, Auckland 2104, New Zealand.
Felicity Goodyear-SmithDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-9401

Funding

Health Research Council of New Zealand 24/015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TikTok is a popular social media platform offering educational opportunities for health issues such as rheumatic fever, which primarily affects 4-19-year-olds globally. This content analysis aimed to explore the type of rheumatic fever content available and popular on TikTok and the role that rheumatic fever representation may play in shaping public understanding and attitudes. The top 100 TikTok video posts under the hashtag #rheumaticfever were examined. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize video metrics and deductive thematic analysis enabled the coding of video content. The majority of TikTok users creating rheumatic fever content were patients or family members of people suffering from rheumatic fever (42%), followed by health professionals (30%). Forty-three percent of videos had negative connotations and personal stories were the most commonly coded type of video (42%). In terms of rheumatic fever content, symptoms (

Indexed as

Health EducationRheumatic FeverSocial MediaAdolescentChildHumansVideo RecordingYoung Adultcontent analysisrheumatic feversocial mediaTikTokvideo

Identifiers

PMID40427803
PMCPMC12111628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.