ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
How Superiors Support Employees to Manage Emotional Demands: A Qualitative Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Article
- Protecting healthcare workers? Effects of a multilevel intervention targeting emotional demands.Health economics review · 2026Article
- Coping Strategies, Self-Efficacy and Their Relationship with Anxiety and Depression in Early Childhood Care Professionals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Double Shield: The Roles of Personal and Organizational Resources in Promoting Positive Outcomes for Employees During Wartime.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research has found that emotional demands in the workplace can be taxing and contribute to an increased risk of mental health challenges, including burnout and depression. This study examines how supervisory support can assist employees in managing these demands. Against this background, we investigated the ways in which supervisors facilitate employees' ability to manage emotional demands while fostering trust in the workplace. Drawing on interviews with supervisors and 32 workgroups from 14 different workplaces, we identified both formal and informal practices that support employees. Supervisor-supported practices include the opportunity for supervision; discussions of emotionally demanding patients, citizens, or students; prompt feedback; "venting"; rotating tasks; and discussing strategies for managing high emotional demands. The findings suggest that supervisors and employees largely align their descriptions of the practice, indicating a shared understanding of supportive practices in the workplace. However, some supervisors were unsure whether to take a proactive or reactive approach to supporting their employees. Additionally, some structural constraints were identified, particularly in the form of budget cuts. Supervisors emphasise the significance of trust-building through accessibility, framing mistakes as learning opportunities, and demonstrating employee confidence. This dual approach, which combines practical support with trust-building, underscores the critical role of supervisors in promoting well-being and engagement in emotionally demanding work environments. While there is a risk that supervisors may exaggerate their efforts toward researchers, employee feedback corroborates their claims. Based on these findings, we recommend that organisations operating in emotionally demanding environments allocate sufficient resources to supervisors, enabling them to implement these practices effectively and foster both emotional support and trust in the workplace.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.