ArticleBiology2025
Predicting Treatment Outcomes in Glioblastoma: A Risk Score Model for TMZ Resistance and Immune Checkpoint Inhibition.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diversity and function of tumor-associated macrophages in brain metastases: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) presents significant therapeutic challenges due to its invasive nature and resistance to standard chemotherapy, i.e., temozolomide (TMZ). This study aimed to identify gene signatures that predict poor TMZ response and high PD-L1/PD-1 tumor expression, and explore potential sensitivity to alternative drugs. We analyzed The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) biopsy data to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) linked to these characteristics. Among 33 upregulated DEGs, 5 were significantly correlated with overall survival. A risk score model was built using these 5 DEGs, classifying patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups. We assessed immune cell infiltration, immunosuppressive mediators, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers in each group using correlation analysis, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and machine learning. The model demonstrated strong predictive power, with high-risk patients exhibiting poorer survival and increased immune infiltration. GSEA revealed upregulation of immune and EMT-related pathways in high-risk patients. Our analyses suggest that high-risk patients may exhibit limited response to PD-1 inhibitors, but could show sensitivity to etoposide and paclitaxel. This risk score model provides a valuable tool for guiding therapeutic decisions and identifying alternative chemotherapy options to enable the development of personalized and cost-effective treatments for GBM patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.