ArticleBiology2025
Integrating Proteomics and GWAS to Identify Key Tissues and Genes Underlying Human Complex Diseases.
Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetically Predicted Associations of CX3CL1 and UMOD with Acute Kidney Injury Risk: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization and Clinical Validation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe tissues of origin and molecular mechanisms underlying human complex diseases remain incompletely understood. Previous studies have leveraged transcriptomic data to interpret genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for identifying disease-relevant tissues and fine-mapping causal genes. However, according to the central dogma, proteins more directly reflect cellular molecular activities than RNA. Therefore, in this study, we integrated proteomic data with GWAS to identify disease-associated tissues and genes.
methodsWe compiled proteomic and paired transcriptomic data for 12,229 genes across 32 human tissues from the GTEx project. Using three tissue inference approaches-S-LDSC, MAGMA, and DESE-we analyzed GWAS data for six representative complex diseases (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, coronary artery disease, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 2 diabetes), with an average sample size of 260 K. We systematically compared disease-associated tissues and genes identified using proteomic versus transcriptomic data.
resultsTissue-specific protein abundance showed a moderate correlation with RNA expression (mean correlation coefficient = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.42-0.49). Proteomic data accurately identified disease-relevant tissues, such as the association between brain regions and schizophrenia and between coronary arteries and coronary artery disease. Compared to GWAS-based gene association estimates alone, incorporating proteomic data significantly improved gene association detection (AUC difference test,
conclusionsIntegrating proteomic data enables accurate identification of disease-associated tissues and provides irreplaceable advantages in fine-mapping genes for complex diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.