Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427743›Full record

ArticleBiology2025

Integrating Proteomics and GWAS to Identify Key Tissues and Genes Underlying Human Complex Diseases.

Chao Xue, Miao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chao XueMedical College, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514031, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3481-4224
Miao ZhouMedical College, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514031, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2022M723666National Natural Science Foundation of China 32300500Talent Start-up Foundation of JiaYing University 323E0454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tissues of origin and molecular mechanisms underlying human complex diseases remain incompletely understood. Previous studies have leveraged transcriptomic data to interpret genome-wide association studies (GWASs) for identifying disease-relevant tissues and fine-mapping causal genes. However, according to the central dogma, proteins more directly reflect cellular molecular activities than RNA. Therefore, in this study, we integrated proteomic data with GWAS to identify disease-associated tissues and genes.

methodsWe compiled proteomic and paired transcriptomic data for 12,229 genes across 32 human tissues from the GTEx project. Using three tissue inference approaches-S-LDSC, MAGMA, and DESE-we analyzed GWAS data for six representative complex diseases (bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, coronary artery disease, Crohn's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and type 2 diabetes), with an average sample size of 260 K. We systematically compared disease-associated tissues and genes identified using proteomic versus transcriptomic data.

resultsTissue-specific protein abundance showed a moderate correlation with RNA expression (mean correlation coefficient = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.42-0.49). Proteomic data accurately identified disease-relevant tissues, such as the association between brain regions and schizophrenia and between coronary arteries and coronary artery disease. Compared to GWAS-based gene association estimates alone, incorporating proteomic data significantly improved gene association detection (AUC difference test,

conclusionsIntegrating proteomic data enables accurate identification of disease-associated tissues and provides irreplaceable advantages in fine-mapping genes for complex diseases.

Indexed as

associated genescomplex diseasesdisease-associated tissuesfine-mappinggenome-wide association studyproteomics

Identifiers

PMID40427743
PMCPMC12109507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.