ArticleBiomolecules2025
Viable Cryopreservation Strategy for Extending the Timeframe of Circulating Tumor Cell Detection in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials.
Article in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) hold recognized prognostic value in various cancers, including breast cancer, where their presence correlates with survival outcomes. However, the typical 24 h window for blood processing and CTC isolation poses a logistical challenge, particularly for multicenter studies. This study aimed to evaluate cryopreservation at different stages of CTC isolation and immunocytological detection to extend the blood sample processing period. Using spiked peripheral blood samples with MDA-MB-231, SKBR3, and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines, four distinct cryopreservation points were assessed: following Ficoll gradient separation, immunomagnetic separation, cytocentrifugation, and cytokeratin labeling. Our findings demonstrated that cryopreservation of the mononuclear and granulocytic cell fraction after double-density Ficoll gradient separation was the only viable method for subsequent CTC detection. This approach allowed for consistent recovery of CK+ CTCs, with an average recovery rate of over 81% after one year of cryopreservation. In contrast, cryopreservation at later stages resulted in undetectable CTCs or only cellular debris. In conclusion, cryopreservation following density gradient centrifugation is a feasible strategy for delaying CTC isolation and immunocytological analysis in breast cancer research, facilitating its application in multicenter clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.