Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427567›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2025

Structural Biology in the AlphaFold Era: How Far Is Artificial Intelligence from Deciphering the Protein Folding Code?

Nicole Balasco, Luciana Esposito, Luigi Vitagliano

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole BalascoInstitute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, National Research Council (CNR), c/o Department Chemistry, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Luciana EspositoInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Research Council (CNR), 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6431-2677
Luigi VitaglianoInstitute of Biostructure and Bioimaging, Department of Biomedical Sciences, National Research Council (CNR), 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3032-3375

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are biomolecules characterized by uncommon chemical and physicochemical complexities coupled with extreme responsiveness to even minor chemical modifications or environmental variations. Since the shape that proteins assume is fundamental for their function, understanding the chemical and structural bases that drive their three-dimensional structures represents the central problem for an atomic-level interpretation of biology. Not surprisingly, this question has progressively become the Holy Grail of structural biology (the folding problem). From this perspective, we initially describe and discuss the different formulations of the folding problem. In the present manuscript, the folding problem is framed from a historical perspective, effectively highlighting the progress made in the last lustrum. We chronologically summarize the major contributions that traditional methodologies provide in approaching this multifaceted problem. We then describe the recent advent and evolution of predictive approaches based on machine learning techniques that are revolutionizing the field by pointing out the potentialities and limitations of this approach. In the final part of the perspective, we illustrate the contribution that computational approaches will make in current structural biology to overcome the limitations of the reductionist approach of studying individual molecules to afford the atomic-level characterization of entire cellular compartments.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceProtein FoldingProteinsComputational BiologyHumansMachine LearningModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsCASPprotein structure predictionssequence–stability relationshipssequence–structure paradigm

Identifiers

PMID40427567
PMCPMC12109453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.