ReviewBiomolecules2025
Liquid Biopsy-Derived Tumor Biomarkers for Clinical Applications in Glioblastoma.
Review in Biomolecules, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in CRISPR/Cas Technologies for Sensitive Cancer Detection: Mechanisms, Platforms, and Clinical Translation Roadmap.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Plasma histone monomers as novel diagnostic markers in adult glioblastoma.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2026Article
- Review
- Multimodal artificial intelligence in glioma management: integrating neuroimaging and hematologic biomarkers for precision oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Temporal Trends and Projected Burden of Bone and Articular Cartilage Malignancies in East Asia: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2026Article
- Exposure-aware multi-omics and artificial intelligence for biomarker discovery and precision prevention in diffuse glioma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Plasma biomarker ORAI1 as a dual prognostic value for survival and postoperative quality of life in glioma patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Context-specific targeting of focal adhesion kinase in brain tumors: lessons from glioblastoma and neurofibromatosis type 2-mutant meningioma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by rapid growth and resistance to chemotherapy. Conventional treatments remain largely ineffective, with patient survival averaging around 18 months after diagnosis. Current diagnostic methods rely on invasive tissue biopsies and imaging tests. While traditional biopsies involve extracting tissue samples, their routine use is often limited by surgical risks and the challenge of accessing sensitive brain regions. Liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising noninvasive alternative, analyzing circulating tumor components-such as DNA, RNA, extracellular vesicles, and microRNAs-found in body fluids. This approach enables initial diagnosis and continuous disease monitoring, offering a significant advantage over traditional biopsies, which are impractical for frequent repetition during treatment follow-up. This review highlights recent advances in liquid biopsy-derived biomarkers for the clinical management of GBM. The discussion includes the advantages, limitations, and potential of these biomarkers as tools for early diagnosis and disease monitoring. A narrative review of the literature published over the last decade (2014-2024) was conducted using major health-focused scientific databases. The analysis focuses on evaluating the clinical relevance and applicability of liquid biopsy in GBM, offering insights into its potential as a minimally invasive and effective tool for improving glioblastoma management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.