Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427441›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Guanidinoacetic Acid and Methionine Supplementation Improve the Growth Performance of Beef Cattle via Regulating the Antioxidant Levels and Protein and Lipid Metabolisms in Serum and Liver.

Simeng Yi, Jinze Wang, Boping Ye, Xin Yi, Abudusaimijiang Abudukelimu, Hao Wu, Qingxiang Meng, Zhenming Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simeng YiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7616-427X
Jinze WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0009-0000-7665-3110
Boping YeState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xin YiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Abudusaimijiang AbudukelimuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Hao WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1320-4603
Qingxiang MengState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhenming ZhouState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

Government Purchase Service of China 16190050Government Purchase Service of China 16200158National Key R&D Program of China 2023YFD1301302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) has been used in ruminant feeding, but it is still unclear whether the exogenous addition of methyl donors, such as methionine (Met), can enhance the effects of GAA. This study investigated the effects of dietary GAA alone or combined with Met on beef cattle growth performance and explored the underlying mechanisms via blood analysis, liver metabolomics, and transcriptomics. Forty-five Simmental bulls (453.43 ± 29.05 kg) were assigned to three groups for 140 days: CON (control), GAA (0.1% GAA), and GAM (0.1% GAA + 0.1% Met), where each group consisted of 15 bulls. Compared with the CON group, the average daily gain (ADG) and feed conversion efficiency (FCE) of the two feed additive groups were significantly increased, and the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) was improved (

Indexed as

antioxidant capacitybeef cattlegrowth performanceguanidinoacetic acidmethionineprotein and lipid metabolisms

Identifiers

PMID40427441
PMCPMC12108366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.