Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427242›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2025

Innovations in Cattle Breeding Technology: Prospects in the Era of Gene Editing.

Yu Wang, Xiangshun Cui, Zhi Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. SCNT and genome editing in Buffalo, the black gold of the tropics.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yu WangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0009-0001-5068-7838
Xiangshun CuiLaboratory of Animal Developmental Biology, Department of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3492-2698
Zhi ChenCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3924-1891

Funding

Independent Innovation in Jiangsu Province of China CX(24)3080National Natural Science Foundation of China 32272825National Natural Science Foundation of China 32472851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a core species in the global livestock industry, cattle play an irreplaceable role in human food security and economic development. Beef cattle and dairy cattle meet the dietary needs of billions of people around the world by providing high-quality protein and dairy products, respectively. With the growth in population and the intensification of the pressure of climate change, traditional breeding techniques may be unsuitable to meet the increasingly growing demands for sustainable and highly adaptable processes. In recent years, the rapid development of genomics, bioinformatics, and gene-editing technologies has provided unprecedented tools and perspectives for the genetic improvement of cattle, driving the precise design and efficient development of new cattle breeds. However, the development of new cattle breeds still faces multiple bottlenecks pertaining to scientific, ethical, and industrialization aspects, which can be addressed through interdisciplinary collaboration. In this review, we will systematically assess the technological progress in the genetic breeding of beef cattle and dairy cattle, analyze the integration path of traditional breeding and modern biotechnology, and explore the future directions of cattle breeding research under the sustainable development goals, with the aim of providing theoretical support for cattle breeding.

Indexed as

biotechnologybreedingcattlegene editing

Identifiers

PMID40427242
PMCPMC12108293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.