ReviewCancers2025
Active Surveillance in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating Tumor Function: A Systems Biology Framework for Liquid Biopsy in Genitourinary Cancers.Genes · 2026Review
- Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a nationwide evaluation.World journal of urology · 2026Observational
- [Non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: time for a de-escalation of treatment and aftercare].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Radiotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy in genitourinary cancers: Diagnostic and prognostic implications.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Epigenetic dysregulation-induced metabolic reprogramming fuels tumor progression in bladder cancer.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bladder cancer is the ninth most common cancer globally, with most cases classified as non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). While transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) remains the gold-standard treatment, its complications, high recurrence rates, and economic burden have prompted interest in alternative strategies like active surveillance (AS) for low-grade and low-grade NMBIC recurrences. AS minimizes surgical interventions and patient burden, but lacks standardized protocols for inclusion criteria and follow-up schedules. Most studies suggest intensive monitoring during the first year, with criteria often based on tumor size, number, and grade. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in December 2024 using Pubmed, Cochrane, and Trip databases to identify studies on AS for low-grade NMBIC recurrences. Only English studies were included, with Boolean operators used to refine the search. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) selection criteria were followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was used to analyze the quality of the included studies. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: This systematic review included 11 studies evaluating AS for NMIBC. Early studies, such demonstrated AS as a feasible alternative to TURBT, with low progression rates. Subsequent research confirmed its safety in selected patients, with tumor growth and positive cytology being the main reasons for intervention. More recent investigations, further supported AS as a viable strategy, highlighting the low risk of stage and grade progression and its potential to reduce surgical interventions.
conclusionsAS may be considered an alternative approach for low-risk NMIBC recurrences. However, there is need for prospective studies and personalized approaches to optimize AS, addressing follow-up strategies, inclusion criteria and progression thresholds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.