Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40427058›Full record

ReviewBiomedicines2025

Pushing the Limits of Interlimb Connectivity: Neuromodulation and Beyond.

Jane A Porter, Trevor S Barss, Darren J Mann, Zahra Karamzadeh, Deborah O Okusanya, Sisuri G Hemakumara, E Paul Zehr, Taryn Klarner, Vivian K Mushahwar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jane A PorterDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Trevor S BarssDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3466-2750
Darren J MannDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-4230-1199
Zahra KaramzadehDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Deborah O OkusanyaDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.
Sisuri G HemakumaraInstitute for Smart Augmentative and Restorative Technologies and Health Innovations (iSMART), University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.
E Paul ZehrSchool of Exercise Science, Physical Education, and Health Education, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada.
Taryn KlarnerSchool of Kinesiology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada.
Vivian K MushahwarDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9873-611X

Funding

Brain Canada Foundation N/ACanada Foundation for Innovation N/ACanada Research Chairs N/ACIHR N/ASpinal Cord Injury Treatment Centre Society N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to walk is often lost after neural injury, leading to multiple secondary complications that reduce quality of life and increase healthcare costs. The current rehabilitation interventions primarily focus on restoring leg movements through intensive training on a treadmill or using robotic devices, but ignore engaging the arms. Several groups have recently shown that simultaneous arm and leg (A&L) cycling improves walking function and interlimb connectivity. These findings highlight the importance of neuronal pathways between the arm (cervical) and leg (lumbar) control regions in the spinal cord during locomotion, and emphasize the need for activating these pathways to improve walking after neural injury or disease. While the findings to date provide important evidence about actively including the arms in walking rehabilitation, these strategies have yet to be optimized. Moreover, improvements beyond A&L cycling alone may be possible with conjunctive targeted strategies to enhance spinal interlimb connectivity. The aim of this review is to highlight the current evidence for improvements in walking function and neural interlimb connectivity after neural injury or disease with cycling-based rehabilitation paradigms. Furthermore, strategies to enhance the outcomes of A&L cycling as a rehabilitation strategy are explored. These include the use of functional electrical stimulation-assisted cycling in acute care settings, utilizing non-invasive transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to activate previously inaccessible circuitry in the spinal cord, and the use of paired arm and leg rehabilitation robotics. This review aims to consolidate the effects of exercise interventions that incorporate the arms on improved outcomes for walking, functional mobility, and neurological integrity, underscoring the importance of integrating the arms into the rehabilitation of walking after neurological conditions affecting sensorimotor function.

Indexed as

arm and leg cyclingfunctional electrical stimulationinterlimb coordinationneuromodulationproprio-spinal connectionsrehabilitationtranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40427058
PMCPMC12109077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.