ReviewBiomedicines2025
Advances in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Implications for Low- and Middle-Income Countries.
Review in Biomedicines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current and future therapies for acute myeloblastic leukemia.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Article
- Diagnosis-Driven Targeted Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Clinical Integration of Tyrosine Kinase, BCL-2, and CD33-Directed Strategies with Midostaurin, Venetoclax, and Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Targeted Therapies Combined with Intensive Chemotherapy in Fit Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Past Developments, Current Evidence, and Future Therapeutic Paradigms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Hybrid APSO-Bayesian optimized triple-kernel SVR models for QSAR and rational design of 1H-pyrrolo[2,3-c]pyridine-based LSD1 Inhibitors.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- CPX-351 and the Frontier of Nanoparticle-Based Therapeutics in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presents a significant global health challenge due to its aggressive behavior and mortality rates. Traditionally, AML treatment has relied on intensive chemotherapy-anthracyclines and cytarabine. However, recent breakthroughs in targeted therapies are transforming clinical practices. This review examines current treatment strategies, including breakthrough therapies. Also, a global perspective on AML management includes the disparity in treatment availability, particularly the difficulties faced by low- and middle-income countries due to the high cost and restricted access to novel therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.