ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Pediatric Medial Discoid Meniscus: Case Series and Postoperative Outcomes.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Bilateral Discoid Medial Menisci in a 52-Year-Old Adult: A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Discoid medial meniscus (DMM) is a rare congenital anomaly, with bilateral cases being even more uncommon. Due to its rarity, comprehensive data on its prevalence, clinical presentation, and optimal management strategies are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and treatment outcomes of symptomatic DMM in a pediatric population. A retrospective review was conducted on patients under 18 years of age diagnosed with symptomatic DMM. Data were extracted using ICD-10 codes Q68.6 and M23.16 and were supplemented by free-text searches. The inclusion criteria encompassed a confirmed DMM diagnosis, availability of MRI and radiographic imaging, complete clinical documentation, and a minimum of six months of postoperative follow-up. Demographic data, clinical presentations, imaging findings, surgical interventions, and outcomes were analyzed. Three patients (five knees) met the inclusion criteria. All presented with symptomatic DMM requiring surgical intervention. Arthroscopic saucerization combined with meniscal repair was performed in all cases. Postoperative follow-up revealed that two of the patients achieved excellent outcomes, while one required three reoperations due to retearing but remained symptom-free at one year post-revision. Radiographic assessments did not reveal characteristic changes typically associated with DMM. Symptomatic DMM, though rare, may be encountered more frequently than previously reported, especially when focusing on symptomatic cases. Arthroscopic saucerization with concurrent meniscal repair appears to be an effective treatment modality, yielding favorable mid-term outcomes. Given the limited number of cases and the variability in their presentations, further research with larger cohorts is essential to establish standardized management protocols and to better understand the long-term prognosis of patients with this rare condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.