Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426813›Full record

ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Role of Genetic Testing in Palliative Care Decisions for Critically Ill Newborns.

Ashley Mowery, Luca Brunelli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley MoweryPediatrics/Neonatology, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5687-7683
Luca BrunelliPediatrics/Neonatology, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic testing is rapidly becoming standard practice in the care of critically ill newborns within NICUs. Numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of genetic testing, including changes in clinical care, improved diagnostic certainty, and cost savings, related to a reduced length of hospital stay. Changes in clinical management reported in previous studies also included redirection to comfort or end-of-life care. However, it has been difficult to study the influence of genetic testing in the redirection of care decisions within the NICU because of the complexity of the medical decision-making process. Redirection of care decisions are deeply personal for each individual family and often must be made in the setting of clinical instability and diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty. A recent study exploring the impact of genetic testing in redirection of care decisions by surveying palliative care providers suggested genetic testing plays a minor role in decisions to redirect to end-of-life care or in the implementation of DNR/DNI orders. However, factors such inadequate treatment options were found to be important in redirection of care decisions, implying the need for further investigation to clarify the role of genetic testing. Future studies will need to focus on how genetic information affects healthcare provider recommendations regarding palliative care and how families use this information to make end-of-life care decisions.

Indexed as

genetics/genomicsneonatal intensive carenewbornpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID40426813
PMCPMC12110491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.