Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426805›Full record

ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Executive Function in Young Children: Validation of the Preschool Executive Task Assessment.

Yael Fogel, Ortal Cohen Elimelech, Naomi Josman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yael FogelDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.
Ortal Cohen ElimelechFaculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 34980, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5270-091X
Naomi JosmanFaculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 34980, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0600-0605

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExecutive function-the cognitive processes and abilities used to perform daily activities and solve real-world problems-is crucial for children's development. However, existing assessments often lack ecological validity, limiting their ability to reflect real-world cognitive performance. This study aims to validate the Preschool Executive Task Assessment (PETA) as a performance-based ecological measure of executive functions in typically developing Israeli children.

methodsThirty-six typically developing children participated. Parents completed a demographic questionnaire and the Child Evaluation Checklist, while children undertook two Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised 95 subtests. Eligible participants completed three performance-based assessments: PETA, the Children's Kitchen Task Assessment (CKTA), and the Do-Eat. Inter-rater reliability was examined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and concurrent validity was assessed via correlations with the CKTA and Do-Eat scores. The Benjamini-Hochberg correction method was used to control false-positive findings.

resultsAge showed weak-to-moderate correlations with key performance measures, including total score, completion time, and required cues (-0.48 < r < -0.37,

conclusionsAlthough further research is needed to refine its use across diverse populations and settings with larger samples, these preliminary findings support the PETA's reliability and validity as a performance-based executive function assessment in young children. This study advances ecologically valid assessments and aids clinicians in selecting appropriate tools for evaluating executive functions in early childhood.

Indexed as

cognitionecological validityperformance-based assessmentpreschool children

Identifiers

PMID40426805
PMCPMC12109970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.