ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Conscious Sedation in Pediatric Oral Surgery: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial on Safety and Efficacy.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- GuREx-MIH: cost-effectiveness analysis of extraction versus restorative treatment for first permanent molars affected by Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation in 11-year-old Swedish children.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Intranasal and Oral Pharmacological Sedation in Pediatric Dentistry: A Thematic Scoping Review of Efficacy, Recovery, and Safety Outcomes.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficacy and Safety of Nitrous Oxide and Midazolam Sedation Protocols in Pediatric Dentistry: A Multicenter Clinical Retrospective Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConscious sedation is a well-established technique used in pediatric dentistry that reduces perioperative stress and pain while maintaining verbal contact with the patient. It is particularly beneficial for anxious, very young, or disabled children, improving cooperation and ensuring airway safety. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of conscious sedation in pediatric oral surgery by analyzing vital parameters before and after treatment.
methodsA total of 57 pediatric patients [29 females; 28 males], aged 5-14 years [mean: 9.4], were treated at the Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico of Milan between September 2022 and June 2024. The patients were divided into two groups: nitrous oxide sedation [Group A] and benzodiazepine sedation [Group B]. Informant consent, medical and dental history, vital signs, and anxiety levels were recorded. A statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon test. Due to the non-randomized design of this study, potential selection bias and limitations in internal validity must be acknowledged.
resultsThe post-sedation diastolic pressure was significantly higher [
conclusionsConscious sedation is a safe and effective approach, maintaining stable vital parameters. The increase in diastolic pressure in Group B may be explained by preexisting anxiety and benzodiazepine pharmacodynamics. However, the absence of randomization may have influenced group allocation and outcome interpretation. Given the small sample size and the wide age range of the participants, further studies with larger and more homogeneous populations are necessary to refine and validate pediatric sedation protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.