ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Modern Treatment of Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do surgical technique and pin configuration influence clinical and radiological outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures? a modified Flynn-based analysis.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2026Article
- A Pediatric Supracondylar Fracture with Bilateral (Medial and Lateral) Pillar Comminution-A Recommendation for a New Stable Pin Configuration for a Highly Unstable Fracture.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Digital three-dimensional planning combined with 3D-printed patient-specific guide-assisted step-cut osteotomy for correction of old cubitus varus deformity: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Radiographic identification method of safe medial pinning zone and its clinical efficacy in pediatric supracondylar humeral fracture fixation.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Supracondylar humeral fractures are the most common type of elbow fractures in children. The treatment methods vary depending on the type of fracture (Gartland classification), which can be conservative or surgical. There is no clear consensus or guidelines to dictate the treatment of complicated supracondylar humeral fractures (Gartland types II and III). Gartland type II and III fractures are most frequently treated with closed reduction and percutaneous Kirchner-wire pinning or open reduction with K-wire pinning, depending on the degree of displacement and the orthopedic surgeon's preference. Most studies recommend avoiding open reduction because of prolonged hospitalization and higher rates of complications. Orthopedic surgeons have different opinions regarding the Kirschner pin placement technique. Studies suggest that only lateral pinning is safe and effective, but medial and lateral pinning is proven to give more stability; there is always a risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve damage during surgery. Modern treatment of supracondylar humeral fracture in children should focus on minimally invasive techniques and avoid open reduction, when possible, to ensure the best outcome for the patients. This scoping review's purpose is to gather the available information on the topic in one place and to underline the lack of clear protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.