ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
From Motor Skills to Digital Solutions: Developmental Dysgraphia Interventions over Two Decades.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cluttering in Children and Adolescents: Speech Motor Development, Neurocognitive Mechanisms, and Allied Health Implications.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Two Languages and One Aphasia: A Systematic Scoping Review of Primary Progressive Aphasia in Chinese Bilingual Speakers, and Implications for Diagnosis and Clinical Care.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDevelopmental dysgraphia, a graphomotor difficulty affecting handwriting, significantly impacts children's academic performance, emotional well-being, and overall development. Over the past two decades, intervention strategies have transitioned from traditional task-oriented motor training to more innovative, technology-driven, and holistic approaches. This paper aims to synthesise key developments in dysgraphia interventions, categorising them into distinct thematic areas and evaluating their effectiveness in improving handwriting outcomes.
methodsA review of 12 key studies was conducted, classifying interventions into four primary categories: (1) task-oriented and sensorimotor-based interventions; (2) technology-assisted solutions; (3) self-regulated and individualised approaches; and (4) integrated methodologies. Each study was analysed based on its methodology, intervention design, target population, and reported outcomes to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of different approaches.
resultsThe findings indicate significant advancements in handwriting interventions, with technology-assisted and integrated approaches demonstrating promising results in engagement, accessibility, and skill development. However, challenges remain in terms of scalability, cultural adaptability, and long-term sustainability. While self-regulated and individualised approaches offer tailored support, their effectiveness depends on factors such as learner motivation and instructional design.
conclusionsDespite progress in intervention strategies for developmental dysgraphia, further research is needed to optimise hybrid models that combine the strengths of multiple approaches. A more inclusive and adaptable framework is required to ensure equitable access to effective handwriting interventions. This study highlights the need for continued collaboration among researchers, educators, and policymakers to advance evidence-based interventions, fostering equitable learning opportunities for all children with dysgraphia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.