ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Dutch Screening Program for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip-Delayed Screening and One-Year Outcomes.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Earthquake-Induced Healthcare Disruption on an Established Developmental Hip Dysplasia Screening Program in an Earthquake Zone.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Incidence and spatial variation of Parkinson's disease in the Netherlands (2017-2022): a population-based study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesIn the Netherlands, selective ultrasound (US) screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) typically occurs at 3 months of age. During the COVID-19 pandemic, US screening was temporarily halted in Dutch hospitals, with consequent delay in DDH screening and possibly inferior outcomes in DDH patients.
methodsWe analyzed 1849 infants screened for DDH during the COVID-19 pandemic (March-August 2020) and 1663 infants screened before the pandemic (March-August 2019). We compared mean age and timing of screening (standard vs. delayed (delayed defined as ≥15 weeks)). For secondary outcomes, we compared DDH patients with delayed screening to standard screening, assessing severity at diagnosis, treatment method and duration, and outcomes at the age of one year, including acetabular index (AI) on radiographs.
resultsMean age at screening was 17.3 weeks during the COVID-19 crisis (2020) vs. 15.8 weeks in the 2019 cohort (mean difference 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-1.8,
conclusionsThis study revealed that disruption of healthcare caused by the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a delay in the Dutch DDH-screening program. However, in this study, delayed screening was not associated with inferior outcomes at the age of one year.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.