ArticleBrain sciences2025
The Influence of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Excitability of the Unstimulated Contralateral Primary Motor Cortex.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increased corticospinal excitability after rest with short term motor performance.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- From API to Action: A Multi-Model Comparison of OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta LLMs for Clinical Trial Data Extraction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) can enhance primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and improve motor skill when delivered unilaterally to the dominant hemisphere. However, the impact of tACS on contralateral M1 excitability both during and after application has not been studied. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of tACS delivered to the dominant left M1 on the excitability of the unstimulated contralateral non-dominant right M1.
methodsThis study implemented a double-blind, randomized, SHAM-controlled, within-subjects, crossover experimental design. Eighteen young adults completed a tACS condition and a SHAM condition on two different days in counterbalanced order with a week washout period between days. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was utilized to assess excitability of the contralateral right M1 while tACS was delivered to the left M1. TMS was administered in five test blocks (termed Pre, D5, D10, D15, and Post) relative to a 20 min application of tACS (70 Hz, 1 mA current strength). The Pre and Post TMS test blocks were conducted before and immediately after tACS was applied to the left M1, whereas the TMS test blocks performed during tACS were completed at time points starting at the 5, 10, and 15 min marks of the 20 min stimulation period. The primary dependent variable was the 1 mV motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. MEP data were analyzed with a 2
resultsThe main effect for
conclusionsOverall, the findings indicate that tACS applied to the left M1 does not significantly modulate contralateral right M1 excitability during or immediately after stimulation, at least when utilizing the present tACS parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.