Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426676›Full record

ReviewBrain sciences2025

Cognitive Factors in Process Model Comprehension-A Systematic Literature Review.

Maximilian Möller, Michael Winter, Manfred Reichert

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maximilian MöllerInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-3692-5683
Michael WinterInstitute of Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry, University of Würzburg, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2561-7923
Manfred ReichertInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, University of Ulm, 89081 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2536-4153

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process models constitute essential tools in business process management and software engineering for representing and managing real-world business processes. Hence, the proper comprehension of these models is crucial for enabling an effective and efficient communication among stakeholders. While several studies have examined factors affecting process model comprehension, such as the used modeling notation or process complexity, there is a lack of in-depth research on the cognitive processes important to comprehend process models deeper. This systematic literature review explores the cognitive mechanisms underlying process model comprehension by integrating insights from relevant disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience and psychology. Key areas of cognition include perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, emotion, and metacognition. This review was conducted following the well-established Kitchenham methodology and included an extensive search in the following digital libraries: Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, ACM Digital Library, PubMed, and SpringerLink. By analyzing 47 studies, this literature review identifies gaps in current research, emphasizing the need for further investigation into these cognitive processes to improve model comprehensibility.

Indexed as

cognitionliterature reviewprocess modelprocess model comprehension

Identifiers

PMID40426676
PMCPMC12109775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.