ReviewBrain sciences2025
Perfecting Sensory Restoration and the Unmet Need for Personalized Medicine in Cochlear Implant Users: A Narrative Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Etiology-Driven Personalized Cochlear Implantation: Implications for Electrode Choice, Timing, and Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Personalizing Cochlear Implant Care in Single-Sided Deafness: A Distinct Paradigm from Bilateral Hearing Loss.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hearing loss is one of the most common and undertreated medical conditions worldwide, with an estimated 466 million people (5% of the world's population) reporting disabling hearing impairment. The implications are significant; untreated hearing loss increases the risk of depression, social isolation, unemployment, cognitive decline, and falls. Cochlear implants (CIs) are surgically implanted electrical devices that allow people with severe hearing loss to process sound. Over the past 50 years, CI development has made remarkable ground, such that most CI users have adequate speech perception in a silent environment. These language achievements, while significant milestones, fall short of perfect sensory restoration. Many of these limitations with complex sound perception are due to our one-size-fits-all approach towards CIs and speech-based metrics for evaluating implant performance. In the past decade, there has been exponential interest in improving CI-mediated music perception, as it serves as a key conduit to restoring normal hearing. The present literature demonstrates the need for a personalized approach towards cochlear implantation and management. Our proposed narrative review illustrates the limitations of CI-mediated sound processing and discusses ways in which precision medicine can be introduced into the ever-expanding hearing loss population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.