ArticleBrain sciences2025
Approach to Patients with Dysphagia: Clinical Insights.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Multi-Center Validation of Artificial Intelligence-Based Video Analysis Platform for Automatic Evaluation of Swallowing Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Dysphagia is a commonly encountered condition in clinical practice, with a rising incidence reported particularly in South Korea. It can be broadly classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia and esophageal dysphagia, and distinguishing between the two is crucial for establishing rehabilitation treatment strategies. Oropharyngeal dysphagia frequently occurs in central nervous system diseases such as stroke, dementia, and Parkinson's disease and has a significant impact on prognosis. Additionally, because there is a high risk of life-threatening aspiration pneumonia in patients complaining of dysphagia, an accurate diagnosis must be made during the early stages of the condition. Patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia may report difficulty initiating swallowing and may experience coughing, choking, nasopharyngeal reflux, aspiration, and a sensation of leftover food in the pharynx during swallowing. Patients with esophageal dysphagia may report a sensation of food getting stuck in the esophagus for a few seconds after the initiation of swallowing. Esophageal dysphagia should be characterized by analyzing whether the foods causing dysphagia are solid, liquid, or both, as well as by the progression of symptoms, whether they are progressive or intermittent; their severity; and associated symptoms such as weight loss, heartburn, or regurgitation. Video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) are invaluable in determining the causes, severity, and treatment strategies for dysphagia. Since swallowing disorders are significant factors influencing the course and prognosis regardless of the type of disease, clinicians should adopt a systematic approach to such disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.