Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426467›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Teacher Adaptability and Student Development in Online Teaching Environments: A Survey of Teachers of Chinese Mathematics Competitions for Gifted Students.

Tianqi Lin, Peijie Jiang, Bin Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianqi LinSchool of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.ORCID 0009-0000-0789-8747
Peijie JiangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0534-6989
Bin XiongSchool of Mathematical Sciences, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China.

Funding

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Pure Mathematics and Mathematical Practice 18DZ2271000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite advancements in information and technology, the benefits of online education for mathematically gifted students remain underexplored. In response, this study investigated the impacts of teacher competencies on students' sustainable development in online mathematics competition education, examining the mediating role of teaching practice and the moderating role of teacher adaptability. Based on survey data from 289 Chinese mathematics competition teachers, the current research yielded the following findings: (1) Online teaching efficacy exerted a stronger positive influence on sustainable development compared with competition teaching professionalism, establishing the crucial role of technological competence in online education. (2) Teaching engagement and teaching practice significantly mediated the relationship between teacher competencies and sustainable development, with teaching engagement demonstrating stronger effects. (3) Teacher adaptability emerged as a significant moderator, empowering teaching practices and their effectiveness in promoting students' sustainable development. These findings construct an integrated theoretical framework for understanding the translation of teacher competencies into student outcomes in online mathematics competition education, providing evidence-based guidance for enhancing teaching effectiveness in mathematics gifted education.

Indexed as

mathematics competitionmediated moderation modelonline educationsustainable developmentteacher adaptabilityteacher competencies

Identifiers

PMID40426467
PMCPMC12108658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.