Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426436›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Spanking and Children's Approaches to Learning: Estimates from a Longitudinal Matched-Sample Design.

Jeehye Kang, Christina M Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeehye KangDepartment of Sociology & Criminal Justice, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2306-4571
Christina M RodriguezDepartment of Psychology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5090-0707

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One form of corporal punishment commonly used in the United States is spanking. Spanking is a well-known risk factor for adverse child development, although its influence on children's approaches to learning (ATL) has been largely overlooked. Existing research is particularly limited in inadequately considering multiple confounds and selection biases in children's exposure to spanking. This study examined the links between spanking and children's ATL, using a matched-group design to strengthen causal estimates among children aged 5 to 7.5 (N = ~12,800) from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Kindergarten Class of 2010-2011. Entropy-balanced matching mitigated selection and confounding biases, controlling for a wide array of covariates. The sensitivity of spanking's effects on ATL was also tested by limiting the sample to low-frequency spanking (once in the past week) to address concerns that primarily higher-frequency spanking predicts ATL. Findings indicated that spanking at age 5.5 was associated with less positive ATL at ages 6.5 and 7.5. These results remained significant when limited to low-frequency spanking. This study's findings suggest that spanking may hinder children's development of positive approaches to learning, which holds significant implications for lifelong well-being. This study contributes to the growing literature on the potential negative effects of physical punishment on child development across multiple domains.

Indexed as

approaches to learningECLS-K: 2011entropy balancingphysical disciplinespanking

Identifiers

PMID40426436
PMCPMC12109518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.