Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426420›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

UMAI-WINGS: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Implementing mHealth Intimate Partner Violence Prevention Intervention in Reducing Intimate Partner Violence Among Women from Key Affected Populations in Kazakhstan Using a Community-Based Approach.

Assel Terlikbayeva, Sholpan Primbetova, Ohshue S Gatanaga, Mingway Chang, Yelena Rozental, Meruert Nurkatova, Zulfiya Baisakova, Yelena Bilokon, Shelly E Karan, Anindita Dasgupta and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Assel TerlikbayevaCenter of Scientific and Practical Initiatives, 38B, Shashkina Str., Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-4067-1998
Sholpan PrimbetovaCenter of Scientific and Practical Initiatives, 38B, Shashkina Str., Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-7633-7764
Ohshue S GatanagaDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6731-3998
Mingway ChangSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6816-7187
Yelena RozentalCenter of Scientific and Practical Initiatives, 38B, Shashkina Str., Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Meruert NurkatovaCenter of Scientific and Practical Initiatives, 38B, Shashkina Str., Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Zulfiya BaisakovaCrisis Center Union, Almaty 050012, Kazakhstan.
Yelena BilokonPublic Foundation "Revansh", Almaty 050038, Kazakhstan.
Shelly E KaranSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.
Anindita DasguptaDepartment of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Louisa GilbertSchool of Social Work, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2715-8310

Funding

Training in Equity and Structural Solutions in Addictions (TESSA)T32DA057920 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GEETANJALI CHANDER, Judith Tsui · 2023 to 2026
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA057920Sexual Violence Research Initiative (SVRI) 123456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Key affected populations (KAPs), including women who use drugs, engage in sex work, or live with HIV, are disproportionately affected by HIV, gender-based violence, substance use, and mental health. In Kazakhstan, they face significantly higher rates of intimate partner violence (IPV), with prevalence ranging from 45% to 75% compared to the national average of 27%, alongside barriers to accessing IPV services. This community-level implementation trial with a waitlist control group evaluated the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of a self-paced mobile health intervention (UMAI-WINGS) for women from KAPs in Kazakhstan. The study enrolled 508 women, with 306 in Almaty City (intervention) and 200 in Almaty Oblast (waitlist control). IPV rates (physical, sexual, and psychological) were assessed at baseline and 6-months post-intervention. Participants in the intervention community were significantly less likely to report psychological (-23.0%), sexual (-27.0%), and physical IPV (-29.0%) at the 6-month follow-up compared to the control group. These results demonstrate the potential of digital, community-driven interventions to reduce IPV among marginalized women and offer a scalable, evidence-based model for implementation. The success of the UMAI-WINGS underscores the value of community-based, mobile health approaches for advancing trauma-informed, survivor-centered care and closing critical service gaps for underserved populations.

Indexed as

community coalitionsgender-based violenceintimate partner violenceKazakhstankey populations

Identifiers

PMID40426420
PMCPMC12109139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.