ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Gender, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Performance: Evidence in Business Education Program.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teacher-related factors and students' academic performance: a multilevel analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- Sex differences in music performance anxiety: the role of self/other-scrutiny and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Influence of mentors' innovation support on postgraduates' proactive innovation behavior: the chain-mediating role of innovation efficacy and creative process engagement.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Development and validation of scales measuring self-efficacy and behavioral capability in managing common medical emergencies in dental clinics.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Self-efficacy, the conviction in one's ability to succeed in particular tasks, is crucial in academic performance and professional development, especially in higher education programs. Although it has been widely studied in STEM disciplines, research on gender differences in self-efficacy in business education is scarce, especially in the Chilean context. This study aims to fill this gap by examining self-efficacy beliefs and their association with academic performance among business students at a Chilean university. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected from 239 students via the validated Academic Self-Efficacy Scale (ESAA). Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the scale's psychometric robustness in measuring situational and personal efficacy beliefs. No significant associations were found between self-efficacy and academic performance. However, gender differences emerged in personal efficacy beliefs, with men reporting higher levels than women, while no differences were found in situational efficacy. These findings reinforce the multidimensional nature of academic self-efficacy and reveal persistent gender disparities in how students perceive their individual academic capacities. This asymmetry may limit women's engagement, confidence, and long-term professional development in male-dominated fields such as business. The results point to the need for gender-sensitive educational strategies that intentionally foster personal efficacy beliefs among female students, thereby promoting more equitable academic experiences and professional trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.