ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025
Four challenging cases of eosinophilic endocarditis or myocarditis with literature review.
Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEosinophilic endocarditis or myocarditis is a major complication of hypereosinophilic syndrome, characterized by eosinophilic infiltration leading to endocardial or myocardial necrosis, thrombosis formation, and fibrosis. For its rare morbility and various heterogenicity, eosinophilic endocarditis or myocarditis is prone to misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis. Neither large case series nor clinical trials on this specific endocarditis or myocarditis have been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: Four middle-aged male patients had increased eosinophilia and elevated levels of troponin or lactate dehydrogenase. Cardiac ultrasound showed ventricular wall thickening with or without reduced cardiac systolic function, apical thrombosis or restrictive cardiomyopathy.one of these patients showed myocardial enhancement by CMR, and one of these patients showed endocardial enhancement by CMR. The coronary angiography results were negative. Three patients were diagnosed with eosinophilic endocarditis, and one was diagnosed with eosinophilic myocarditis. After the application of steroid treatment, eosinophil levels decreased rapidly, myocardial thickening was relieved, and cardiac function was gradually recovered.
conclusionThis case series embodies the high heterogeneity in the clinical manifestation of the eosinophilic myocarditis or endocarditis, and the important role of multi-module imaging. Early detection and early treatment is crucial for the prognosis of eosinophilic endocarditis or myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.