ArticleBiology direct2025
scE2EGAE: enhancing single-cell RNA-Seq data analysis through an end-to-end cell-graph-learnable graph autoencoder with differentiable edge sampling.
Article in Biology direct, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- scTACL: a multitask topology-aware contrastive learning approach for single-cell transcriptomics analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) technology reveals biological processes and molecular-level genomic information among individual cells. Numerous computational methods, including methods based on graph neural networks (GNNs), have been developed to enhance scRNA-Seq data analysis. However, existing GNNs-based methods usually construct fixed graphs by applying the k-nearest neighbors algorithm, which may result in information loss.
methodsTo address this problem, we propose scE2EGAE, which learns cell graphs during the training processes. Firstly, the scRNA-Seq data is fed into a deep count autoencoder (DCA). Secondly, the hidden representations of DCA are extracted and then used to generate cell-to-cell graph edges through a straight-through estimator (STE) based on top-k sampling and Gumbel-Softmax. Finally, the generated cell-to-cell graph and scRNA-Seq data are fed into the GNNs-based downstream tasks. In this paper, we design a graph autoencoder which performs denoising on scRNA-Seq data as the downstream task.
resultsWe evaluate scE2EGAE on eight public scRNA-Seq datasets and compare its performance with seven existing scRNA-Seq data denoising methods. In this paper, extensive experiments are conducted, encompassing: 1) the evaluation of denoising performance, with metrics including mean absolute error, Pearson correlation coefficient, and cosine similarity; 2) the assessment of clustering performance of the denoised results, utilizing adjusted rand index, normalized mutual information and silhouette score; and 3) the evaluation of the cell trajectory inference performance of the denoised results, measured by the pseudo-temporal ordering score. The results show that, on the scRNA-Seq data denoising task, scE2EGAE outperforms most of the methods, proving that it can learn cell-to-cell graphs containing real information of cell-to-cell relationships.
conclusionsIn this paper, we validate the proposed scE2EGAE method through its application to the denoising task of scRNA-Seq data. This method demonstrates its capability to learn inter-cellular relationships and construct cell-to-cell graphs, thereby enhancing the downstream analysis of scRNA-Seq data. Our approach can serve as an inspiration for future research on scRNA-Seq analysis methods based on GNNs, holding broad application prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.