ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Host susceptibilities and entry processes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variants using pseudotyped viruses carrying spike protein.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The zoonotic potential has been well studied for SARS-CoV-2 and its earlier variants, but the information for Omicron variants and SARS-CoV is lacking. In this study, we generated lentivirus-based pseudoviruses carrying spike protein (S) of SARS-CoV-2, parental and Omicron variants including BA.1.1, BA.4/5, XBB.1 and JN.1 to assess the entry into cells expressing human or animal ACE2 including dogs, cats and white-tailed deer. Using these pseudoviruses, along with pseudoviruses carrying S of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV, we assessed the protease processing of these various S through western blotting, entry/inhibition assays, and fusion assays. The results showed that overall, pseudotyped viruses carrying each S of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strains efficiently entered cells expressing human or animal ACE2 comparably (BA.1.1 and JN.1) or better (BA.4/5 and XBB.1) than those with parental strain. In addition, the entries of pseudotyped viruses carrying S of SARS-CoV were also efficient the cells expressing human or animal ACE2. The presence of TMPRSS2 significantly increased the entry of all tested pseudoviruses including those with S of MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2, with BA.1.1, JN1, and XBB.1 Omicron having the largest fold increase. When cathepsin inhibitors were examined to assess their inhibitory effects on entry of parental and Omicron variants, they were significantly less effective in the entry of Omicron variants compared to parent strain, suggesting Omicron strains do not depend on the endosomal route compared to parental strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.