Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426225›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

"They wanted to, but they just couldn't get there": GBA + implementation and gaps during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Lara Hollmann, Julia Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Muhammad Haaris TiwanaFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. mhtiwana@sfu.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1344-6565
Lara HollmannFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5500-8275
Julia SmithFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5175-1109

Funding

CIHR 486835
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo improve understanding of the barriers and enablers to implementing gender and intersectional analysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada.

methodsWe conducted a policy document analysis (n = 70) of equity-focused policies of the Canadian government published between March 2020 and August 2023. This analysis was complemented with 16 semi-structured key informant interviews with federal policy actors and leadership of civil society organizations.

resultsPandemic policy documents demonstrated multiple commitments to address pandemic related inequities, with key informants describing collaborative approaches to implementing these policies, but also limits in terms of the urgent and diffused nature of pandemic response. Implementation gaps related to accessible information, health services and vaccinations were noted and attributed to a reliance on civil society actors who lacked sufficient and sustainable resources, and the behaviors of priority populations whose capacity to comply was limited by the same inequities the policies sought to address.

conclusionThe Canadian federal government made concerted efforts to address the needs of a range of priority populations and equity issue areas within its pandemic response, with mixed results. Having a pre-established framework to guide implementation and related relationships overcame some of the urgency challenges related with pandemic response. However, implementation gaps reflected preexisting inequities shaped by broader economic, social and political systems which were infrequently addressed in pandemic policies. There is a need for greater understanding of policy implementation gaps during emergency and crisis response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health EquityHealth PolicyCanadaHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2CanadaCOVID-19EquityGender based analysisPandemicPolicy analysisPriority populations

Identifiers

PMID40426225
PMCPMC12117922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.