ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025
Reveal the mechanism of brain function with fluorescence microscopy at single-cell resolution: from neural decoding to encoding.
Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As a key pathway for understanding behavior, cognition, and emotion, neural decoding and encoding provide effective tools to bridge the gap between neural mechanisms and imaging recordings, especially at single-cell resolution. While neural decoding aims to establish an interpretable theory of how complex biological behaviors are represented in neural activities, neural encoding focuses on manipulating behaviors through the stimulation of specific neurons. We thoroughly analyze the application of fluorescence imaging techniques, particularly two-photon fluorescence imaging, in decoding neural activities, showcasing the theoretical analysis and technological advancements from imaging recording to behavioral manipulation. For decoding models, we compared linear and nonlinear methods, including independent component analysis, random forests, and support vector machines, highlighting their capabilities to reveal the intricate mapping between neural activity and behavior. By employing synthetic stimuli via optogenetics, fundamental principles of neural encoding are further explored. We elucidate various encoding types based on different stimulus paradigms-quantity encoding, spatial encoding, temporal encoding, and frequency encoding-enhancing our understanding of how the brain represents and processes information. We believe that fluorescence imaging-based neural decoding and encoding techniques have deepened our understanding of the brain, and hold great potential in paving the way for future neuroscience research and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.