ArticlePopulation health metrics2025
Applying group-based trajectory modeling to understand under-five mortality trends and determinants in low-and lower-middle income countries.
Article in Population health metrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReducing under-five mortality is a global health priority. Countries need specific data on which interventions have the most potential to lead to improvements to inform their programs and policies.
methodsGroup-based trajectory modeling was applied to identify distinct trajectories of under-five mortality from 2000 to 2019 in 78 low and lower-middle income countries. Both health and non-health variables were studied as time-stable covariates of trajectory group membership and as time-varying covariates of mortality rates within groups.
resultsWe identified four distinct groups that were primarily distinguished based on trajectory level rather than shape-low mortality, medium mortality, medium-high mortality and high mortality. All four groups had under-five trajectories that declined over time with the highest mortality group having the largest declines. We conducted two sets of bivariate analyses. The first analysis was conducted to understand what factors distinguished the different groups from one another (time stable covariate analysis), and the second analysis was done to understand what factors were significant within a group (time vaying covariate analysis). Results indicated that five factors were associated with all three comparisons of being in the low, medium and medium high groups compared to the highest mortality group. These factors were fertility rate, % of population with an improved water source, female secondary school enrollment rate, diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus dose 3 (DPT3) coverage and % of gross domestic product (GDP) on health expenditures. Results of the modeling of the within group analysis with time-varying factors indicated that higher fertility rates and higher out-of-pocket expenditures were significantly associated with greater mortality rates for all four groups. High DPT3 coverage, greater political stability, high coverage of births in a health facility and a greater % GDP on health expenditures were significantly associated with reduced under-five mortality for all four groups.
conclusionFindings from our study revealed the importance of considering both health and non-health factors in understanding trajectories of under-five mortality. In particular the fertility rate and % of GDP on health expenditures were signicant for all three comparisons of the trajectory group membership analysis (time-stable covariates) and were significant for all four groups in the within group analysis (time varying covariates). Other factors were significant for some comparisons and groups. Focusing on a number of key factors relevant to their group could help countries to further improve the health of young children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.