ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Research on the clinical and pathological characteristics of primary orbital neoplastic lesions with communication.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo comprehensively summarize the clinical and pathological characteristics of primary orbital neoplastic lesions with communication, thereby providing a solid basis for the diagnosis and treatment of such conditions.
methodA retrospective analysis of clinical cases was conducted. The clinical and pathological data of 862 patients diagnosed with primary orbital neoplasms with communication, including orbito-cranial, orbito-nasal, and orbito-crano-nasal communicating tumors, were collected. The data covered gender distribution, age at onset, presenting symptoms and signs, imaging findings, and treatment modalities. These data were systematically summarized according to pathological diagnoses.
resultsAmong all primary orbito-related communication neoplasms, meningioma was identified as the most common benign tumor (11.0%, 95/862), with a mean age of onset of 45.3 ± 12.7 years. Notably, 72.6% of meningiomas originated from the orbit, while 27.4% originated from intracranial sites. In contrast, adenoid cystic carcinoma was the most common malignant tumor (9.5%, 82/862), with a mean age of onset of 39.1 ± 12.8 years. The majority of adenoid cystic carcinomas (59.8%) originated from the orbit, whereas 29.3% originated from the sinuses. In the pediatric population under the age of 14 years, a total of 102 cases were identified. Out of these, there were 67 cases of orbito-cranial communication (65.7%), 5 cases of orbito-nasal communication (4.9%), and 30 cases of orbito-crano-nasal communication (29.4%). Optic glioma was the most common benign tumor in pediatric orbito-cranial communication (22.4%, 15/67), with an average age of onset at 5.6 ± 4.2 years. The most prevalent malignant tumor among children with orbito-cranial communication was small round cell tumor (10.4%, 7/67), with an average age of onset at 4.6 ± 3.7 years. In children with orbital-cranio-nasal communication, sarcoma was identified as the most common malignant tumor (43.3%, 13/30), with 76.9% of tumors originating from the nose. The most common benign tumor in this group was nasopharyngeal fibroangioma (16.7%, 5/30), which exclusively affected males and originated from the nasopharynx.
conclusionThe clinical features and pathological classification of primary orbital tumors vary significantly depending on the type of communication. Moreover, there are substantial differences in the pathological subtypes of these orbital lesions between children and adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.