ArticleBMC medical education2025
Interprofessional training in medical education: competency, collaboration, and multi-level analysis across seven governorates, Egypt.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of a simulation-based interprofessional education program using a high-fidelity simulator: a quasi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Obstacles to effective implementation of interprofessional education in Sudan.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterprofessional Education (IPE) is essential in improving patient outcomes by promoting teamwork and collaboration among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to assess the impact of IPE on developing clinical competencies and collaborative practices in Egyptian intensive care units (ICUs). The core modules focused on managing antibiotic resistance, venous thromboembolism (VTE), and mechanical ventilation (MV), chosen for their high prevalence in Egyptian ICUs and significant impact on patient outcomes.
methodsThe IPE program was implemented across seven governorates, involving 16 hospitals and multidisciplinary ICU teams. It was conducted in two consecutive four-month waves, each covering the three core modules. Participants included physicians, clinical pharmacists, and ICU nurses. To enhance efficacy, a blended learning approach combined virtual webinars, case-based discussions, and in-person workshops. Data collection included pre- and post-tests, a post-training satisfaction survey, and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS) to assess competency improvements.
resultsThe IPE program included 157 participants, with 79 in wave 1 and 78 in wave 2. Physicians were mostly male (47.2%) and older (> 40 years), while clinical pharmacists and ICU nurses were younger and predominantly female (89.6% and 75.7%, respectively). For exam performance, clinical pharmacists had the highest excellence rate (22.4%), while ICU nurses had the highest failure rate (40.5%). Post-training, interprofessional competence improved significantly, with physicians showing the greatest competency gains (p < 0.05) and clinical pharmacists playing a key role in antibiotic resistance management (p = 0.029). Overall satisfaction was high across modules, increasing from 79.8% in Module 1 to 90.5% in Module 3. Higher satisfaction was observed among females (up to 89.5%), participants aged 30-40 (92.6% in Module 2), and those who received sufficient program information (p = 0.011), with lecturers median score rated consistently 5.0, while material satisfaction median score varied (4.0-4.8).
conclusionsThe IPE program improved interprofessional collaboration and clinical competency, despite challenges such as participant dropout, scheduling conflicts, and engagement in virtual sessions. By addressing issues like antimicrobial resistance and critical care management, it provides a practical model for improving healthcare outcomes, particularly in resource-limited settings. This program is a preliminary step, with plans to expand to more hospitals in Egypt and conduct further research on its long-term impact on patient outcomes and potential for replication in healthcare systems worldwide. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.