ArticleBMC oral health2025
Mechanical and biological properties of 3D-printed porous titanium scaffolds coated with composite growth factors.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Ti-6Al-4V Alloys with Nanoporous and Nanotubular Surfaces for the Treatment of Femoral Defects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Immunotherapy and postoperative bone defect repair strategies based on osteosarcoma tumor microenvironment characteristics: balancing antitumor effects and promotion of bone regeneration.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Enhancing the Antibacterial and Biointegrative Properties of Microporous Titanium Surfaces Using Various Metal Coatings: A Comparative Study.Prosthesis (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Finite Element Analysis of Von Mises Stress in External Fixators for Open Tibial Fractures: A Comparative Study of ASTM F1541-02 and Tibia-Based Models in Indonesian Patients.Healthcare technology lettersArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsseointegration is considered a prerequisite for predicting implant success, and structure, biocompatibility, and properties of the implant are important parts of the factors that influence osseointegration. The focus of current research is on how to increase the strength of osseointegration on the implant and shorten the osseointegration time.
methodsIn this research, different porous scaffolds, including uniform, radial-gradient, and axial-gradient porous, were designed and fabricated. Their mechanical properties and biocompatibility were comprehensively evaluated through mechanical tests and in vitro cellular experiments. A porous scaffold exhibiting optimal properties was identified through preliminary experiments. Subsequently, three different sets of composite scaffolds were developed, consisting of the selected scaffold modified with chitosan microspheres loaded with Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 (BMP-2), Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-BB (PDGF-BB), or a combination of both. The biological responses to composite scaffolds were systematically examined through in vitro and in vivo experiments.
resultsFinite element analysis indicated that the maximum equivalent stress of all three porous implants was lower than that of solid implants, while the maximum equivalent stress in the cortical bone of the porous group was higher than in the solid group. Compression tests confirmed that the elastic modulus of all three porous scaffold structures fall within the range of natural human bone. In vitro cell experiments showed that the radial gradient porous group scaffolds had the highest cell count and Alkaline phosphatase activity. The composite scaffolds exhibited superior wettability and water absorption properties compared to the non-coated scaffolds. Cell and animal experiments demonstrated that the titanium scaffolds co-modified with BMP-2 and PDGF-BB showed greater cell proliferation and new bone formation compared to scaffolds with single-factor coatings and uncoated scaffolds.
conclusionsRadial-gradient porous scaffolds exhibit compatible elastic modulus, excellent cell compatibility, and osteogenic potential, making them promising candidates for bone tissue engineering applications in dentistry. Furthermore, the composite scaffolds incorporating BMP-2 and PDGF-BB-loaded chitosan microspheres demonstrated enhanced osteogenic differentiation compared to single-factor modified porous scaffolds, providing experimental evidence for the clinical application of novel implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.