ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
Machine learning models for predicting in-hospital mortality from acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning for Risk Stratification in Acute Pancreatitis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- An interpretable XGboost algorithm for predicting 30-day mortality in acute pancreatitis using routine biomarkers.BMC medical research methodology · 2026Article
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Translational Potential and Explainability of Artificial Intelligence-Based Clinical Decision Support for Adults in Intensive Care: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based strategies for improving healthcare data quality: an evaluation of accuracy, completeness, and reusability.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute pancreatitis (AP) represents a critical medical condition where timely and precise prediction of in-hospital mortality is crucial for guiding optimal clinical management. This study focuses on the development of advanced machine learning (ML) models to accurately predict in-hospital mortality among AP patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU).
methodOur study utilized data from three distinct sources: the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III), MIMIC-IV databases, and Beijing Chaoyang Hospital. We systematically developed and evaluated 11 distinct machine learning (ML) models, employing a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics to assess model performance, including the area under the curve (AUC). To enhance interpretability and identify key predictive features, we implemented Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis for the top-performing model. Furthermore, we developed a streamlined version of the model through strategic feature reduction, followed by rigorous hyperparameter optimization (HPO) to maximize predictive performance. To facilitate clinical implementation, we designed and deployed an intuitive web-based calculator, enabling convenient access and practical application of our optimized predictive model.
resultThe study analyzed 1802 AP patients, with 266 (14.8%) experiencing in-hospital mortality. A set of 27 features was utilized to construct various models, and among them, CatBoost demonstrated the highest performance in both the validation and test sets. To create a more concise model, we selected the top 13 features. After HPO, the AUC in the test set reached 0.835 (95% CI: 0.793-0.872), the AUC in the external validation from Beijing Chaoyang hospital was 0.782 (95% CI: 0.699-0.860).
conclusionML models have shown promising reliability in predicting in-hospital mortality among patients with AP in the ICU. Among these models, the CatBoost model exhibits superior predictive performance, providing valuable assistance to clinical practitioners in identifying high-risk patients and facilitating early interventions to enhance prognosis. The development of a compact model and a web-based calculator further enhances the convenience of using these models in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.