Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426156›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Evaluating the access and utilization of eyecare services after the adoption of eyecare PBF and its financial sustainability: the case of Rwanda.

James Humuza, Thierry Claudien Uhawenimana, Jean Bosco Ndayambaje, Stella Umuhoza Matutina, Tiva Kananura, Janvier Mungarulire, Theoneste Mutsindashyaka, Hassan Mugabo, Emmanuel Ntawuyirusha, Angeline Mumararungu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

James HumuzaDepartment of Health Policy, Economics and Management School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Po. Box: 3286, Kigali, Rwanda. humuzajames@gmail.com.
Thierry Claudien UhawenimanaMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Bosco NdayambajeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Stella Umuhoza MatutinaDepartment of Health Policy, Economics and Management School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Po. Box: 3286, Kigali, Rwanda.
Tiva KananuraThe Fred Hollows Foundation, Rwanda Country Office, Kigali, Rwanda.
Janvier MungarulireThe Fred Hollows Foundation, Rwanda Country Office, Kigali, Rwanda.
Theoneste MutsindashyakaMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Hassan MugaboRwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC), Kigali, Rwanda.
Emmanuel NtawuyirushaMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Angeline MumararunguMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ntagara Ngabo DonatienMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.
Henry MwangiThe Fred Hollows Foundation, Kenya Country Office, Nairobi, Kenya.
Caroline NdoloThe Fred Hollows Foundation, Kenya Country Office, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mohamed SemakulaMinistry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSustainable improvements in eye care outcomes has been a concern for policy makers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examined the changes in access and utilization of eye care service at primary care level and explored financial sustainability options, after adoption of eye Performance Based Financing (PBF) in Rwanda in 2019.

methodsThis study uses case study approach. We conducted desk review to obtain utilization and financial data to assess trends in eye care utilization levels after the introduction of eye PBF and explored financial sustainability options for the eye PBF. We further conducted key informant interviews with different actors' groups at the health centers, district hospitals, and national level. Thirty-eight participants (n = 38) including eye care providers, health management personnel, health policy makers, and eye care stakeholders at central level selected purposively participated in the study. A framework analysis was employed to analyse data based on the aims of the study.

resultsOur findings suggest that incorporating PBF within the eyecare services contributed to access and utilization of eye care services at primary care level. Before the adoption of eye PBF (FY 2018-2019), the number of patients consulting for eye care showed a decreasing trend. After the adoption of eye care PBF (between FY 2018-2019 and FY 2021-2022), the number of patients who consulted for eye needing surgery increased from 228,302 to 1,029,299. During the same period, the share of eye care patients to total patients in outpatient department increased from 1.4% (2017) to 5.4% (2022). Furthermore, before the introduction of eye care PBF, the coverage of patients with cataract operations showed a slow trend from 36.1% (FY 2016-2017) to 37.8% (FY 2018-2019). After introducing eyecare PBF, a sustained increase in cataract operations was noted from 37.8% (FY 2018-2019) to 45.6% (FY 2021-2022). However, due to shortage in providers, more than half of people with identified operable cataracts still needed cataract surgery. Stakeholders across actors' groups supported the narrative that eye care PBF contributed to increase in access and utilization of eye care services, enhanced capacity building of eye care staff, improved essential eye care supplies, and strengthened primary care and district hospitals linkages. While the donors have historically predominantly funded the eye care sector (64.2%), including 100% for eye PBF, the study found that the government of Rwanda recently increased its resource allocation (from 28% in 2017 to 35.8% in 2022) to support 100% eye care providers' salaries and maintaining eye infrastructure.

conclusionThe study reveals contributions of eye PBF to the eye care performance as well as health system challenges, including financial sustainability issues, that calls for policy makers and development partners to act.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityOphthalmologyReimbursement, IncentiveHumansPrimary Health CareRwandaEffectivenessEvaluationEyecarePerformance-based financingRwandaSustainability

Identifiers

PMID40426156
PMCPMC12117820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.