ArticleBMC health services research2025
Evaluating the access and utilization of eyecare services after the adoption of eyecare PBF and its financial sustainability: the case of Rwanda.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Service users' perspectives on primary eye care services following performance-based financing in Rwanda: an exploratory qualitative study.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- From Aid Dependency to Self-Reliance: Lessons From Sierra Leone and Rwanda's Strategies for Eliminating Preventable Blindness in Africa: A Perspective Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence of vision impairment in Rwanda: a hospital-based study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSustainable improvements in eye care outcomes has been a concern for policy makers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We examined the changes in access and utilization of eye care service at primary care level and explored financial sustainability options, after adoption of eye Performance Based Financing (PBF) in Rwanda in 2019.
methodsThis study uses case study approach. We conducted desk review to obtain utilization and financial data to assess trends in eye care utilization levels after the introduction of eye PBF and explored financial sustainability options for the eye PBF. We further conducted key informant interviews with different actors' groups at the health centers, district hospitals, and national level. Thirty-eight participants (n = 38) including eye care providers, health management personnel, health policy makers, and eye care stakeholders at central level selected purposively participated in the study. A framework analysis was employed to analyse data based on the aims of the study.
resultsOur findings suggest that incorporating PBF within the eyecare services contributed to access and utilization of eye care services at primary care level. Before the adoption of eye PBF (FY 2018-2019), the number of patients consulting for eye care showed a decreasing trend. After the adoption of eye care PBF (between FY 2018-2019 and FY 2021-2022), the number of patients who consulted for eye needing surgery increased from 228,302 to 1,029,299. During the same period, the share of eye care patients to total patients in outpatient department increased from 1.4% (2017) to 5.4% (2022). Furthermore, before the introduction of eye care PBF, the coverage of patients with cataract operations showed a slow trend from 36.1% (FY 2016-2017) to 37.8% (FY 2018-2019). After introducing eyecare PBF, a sustained increase in cataract operations was noted from 37.8% (FY 2018-2019) to 45.6% (FY 2021-2022). However, due to shortage in providers, more than half of people with identified operable cataracts still needed cataract surgery. Stakeholders across actors' groups supported the narrative that eye care PBF contributed to increase in access and utilization of eye care services, enhanced capacity building of eye care staff, improved essential eye care supplies, and strengthened primary care and district hospitals linkages. While the donors have historically predominantly funded the eye care sector (64.2%), including 100% for eye PBF, the study found that the government of Rwanda recently increased its resource allocation (from 28% in 2017 to 35.8% in 2022) to support 100% eye care providers' salaries and maintaining eye infrastructure.
conclusionThe study reveals contributions of eye PBF to the eye care performance as well as health system challenges, including financial sustainability issues, that calls for policy makers and development partners to act.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.