ArticleBMC oral health2025
Assessing shear bond strength of various surface treatments of titanium alloy with high translucency monolithic zirconia.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fracture resistance and failure modes in 4- vs. 6-implant supported zirconia full-arch prostheses with and without cantilevers: anThe journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the shear bond strength of high translucent monolithic zirconia and titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) after various surface treatments using resin cement. MATERIALS AND
methodsNinety Ti6Al4V specimens were randomly allocated into six groups (n = 15 per group): untreated titanium (CT; control), 50-µm alumina airborne-particle abrasion (AB), 9.5% hydrofluoric acid (HF), anodization (AN), AB followed by AN (AB-AN), and HF followed by AN (HF-AN). Representative specimen from each group was examined using a scanning electron microscope and laser confocal microscopy. The specimens were bonded with 50-µm alumina air-abraded high translucent monolithic zirconia specimen using 10-methacryloyloxydecal dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP)-containing primer and 10-methoxyl methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based resin cement. The failure mode of was classified using a stereomicroscope. Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey's adjustment for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05).
resultsThe mean bond strength of AB (36.9 ± 1.6 MPa) and HF (32.5 ± 3.4 MPa) groups were statistically significantly higher than other groups (p < 0.05). The AN group showed the lowest bond strength (29.55 ± 3.62 MPa); however, there was no significant difference between CT, AN, AB-AN, and HF-AN. The stereomicroscopic analysis revealed that the AN, AB-AN, and HF-AN groups predominantly showed mixed failure modes.
conclusionThe surface treatment of Ti6Al4V with either 50-µm alumina airborne-particle abrasion or 9.5% hydrofluoric acid improved the bond strength between Ti6Al4V and high translucent monolithic zirconia. Anodization did not improve the bond strength, regardless of the surface treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.