ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Machine learning decision support model construction for craniotomy approach of pineal region tumors based on MRI images.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multiparametric MRI characteristics for differentiating primary cancer origin in brain metastases.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPineal region tumors (PRTs) are rare but deep-seated brain tumors, and complete surgical resection is crucial for effective tumor treatment. The choice of surgical approach is often challenging due to the low incidence and deep location. This study aims to combine machine learning and deep learning algorithms with pre-operative MRI images to build a model for PRTs surgical approaches recommendation, striving to model clinical experience for practical reference and education.
methodsThis study was a retrospective study which enrolled a total of 173 patients diagnosed with PRTs radiologically from our hospital. Three traditional surgical approaches of were recorded for prediction label. Clinical and VASARI related radiological information were selected for machine learning prediction model construction. And MRI images from axial, sagittal and coronal views of orientation were also used for deep learning craniotomy approach prediction model establishment and evaluation.
results5 machine learning methods were applied to construct the predictive classifiers with the clinical and VASARI features and all methods could achieve area under the ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) curve (AUC) values over than 0.7. And also, 3 deep learning algorithms (ResNet-50, EfficientNetV2-m and ViT) were applied based on MRI images from different orientations. EfficientNetV2-m achieved the highest AUC value of 0.89, demonstrating a significant high performance of prediction. And class activation mapping was used to reveal that the tumor itself and its surrounding relations are crucial areas for model decision-making.
conclusionIn our study, we used machine learning and deep learning to construct surgical approach recommendation models. Deep learning could achieve high performance of prediction and provide efficient and personalized decision support tools for PRTs surgical approach. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.