Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426136›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Factors associated with cervical cancer screening: results from cross-sectional surveys in Kenya and Malawi.

Corrina Moucheraud, Symon Chibaka, Ginger Golub, Pericles Kalande, Amos Makwaya, Eric Ochieng, Vitalis Ogutu, Khumbo Phiri, Sam Phiri, Risa M Hoffman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Corrina MoucheraudSchool of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, USA. cm6512@nyu.edu.
Symon ChibakaChildren in the Wilderness, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Ginger GolubInnovations for Poverty Action, Nairobi, Kenya.
Pericles KalandePartners in Hope, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Amos MakwayaPartners in Hope, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Eric OchiengInnovations for Poverty Action, Nairobi, Kenya.
Vitalis OgutuInnovations for Poverty Action, Nairobi, Kenya.
Khumbo PhiriPartners in Hope, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Sam PhiriPartners in Hope, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Risa M HoffmanDavid Geffen School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, Los Angeles, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer screening is an essential public health intervention, and critical to meeting the Global Strategy for Cervical Cancer Elimination goals - yet most women in low- and middle-income countries are never screened. There is a need to understand context-specific factors that facilitate or prevent women from engaging in screening.

methodsThis analysis leverages data collected in 2022-2023 from a national mobile phone-based survey in Kenya and from a household survey conducted in three districts of Malawi. Informed by the Health Belief Model, we assess whether women's reported cervical cancer screening history (ever or never screened) was associated with their perceived susceptibility (awareness of cervical cancer risk factors), perceived severity (knowing someone who was affected by cervical cancer), perceived barriers (access to services), perceived benefits (trust in information about cervical cancer prevention), self-efficacy (engagement in other preventive health behaviors), and cues to action (speaking with others about cervical cancer prevention).

resultsEver-screening for cervical cancer was reported by 49.7% of the 736 Kenyan respondents and 42.5% of the 261 Malawian respondents. There were few associations between women's demographic or socioeconomic characteristics and screening history. The strongest associations were seen for cues to action (women who had spoken about cervical cancer with health workers had 1.88 the adjusted risk ratio for screening in Kenya [95% CI 1.59, 2.24] and 1.89 the adjusted risk in Malawi [95% CI 1.41, 2.54] compared to women who never had these conversations); and for knowing someone who had, or who had died due to, cervical cancer (aRR 1.34 and 1.30 respectively in Kenya, and aRR 2.03 and 1.46 respectively in Malawi). In both countries, self-efficacy was also associated with screening, as was perceived severity in both countries (i.e., knowing someone who had, or who had died due to cervical cancer, which was reported by many Kenyan and Malawian respondents). In Kenya, knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors was also associated with women's screening history, as was access to other preventive health services in Malawi.

conclusionsThese results suggest promising areas for interventions aiming to increase cervical cancer screening in these contexts: encouraging health workers to discuss screening with eligible women, leveraging women's peers who have been affected by cervical cancer, and promoting screening during other preventive health services.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaMalawiMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCervical cancer screeningKenyaMalawi

Identifiers

PMID40426136
PMCPMC12107903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.