Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426100›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Development and validation of a preeclampsia prediction model for the first and second trimester pregnancy based on medical history.

Qi Xu, Lili Xing, Ting Zhang, Guoli Liu

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preeclampsia Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Qi Xu *Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R. China.
Lili Xing *Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R. China.
Ting ZhangObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Obstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Ordos Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, No.9 Wansheng Ring Road, Dongsheng District, Ordos City, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, P.R. China.
Guoli LiuObstetrics and Gynaecology Department, Peking University People's Hospital, No.11 Xizhimen South Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, P.R. China. guoleeliu@163.com.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 22JCZXJC00160Peking University People's Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds RDJP2023-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe study aimed to identify the risk factors of preeclampsia (PE) and establish a novel prediction model. STUDY

designA retrospective, single-center analysis was conducted using clinical data from 5099 pregnant women who gave birth at Peking University People's Hospital between June 2015 and December 2020 who had placental growth factor (PIGF) levels records at 13-20 + 6 gestation weeks. The participants were randomly divided into a training set (70%, n = 3569) and a validation set (30%, n = 1030), between which the consistency was checked, and the analysis was performed according to whether PE occurred during pregnancy. Factors with univariate logistic analysis outcome of p < 0.2 were incorporated into the multivariate logistic regression analysis model, then variable selection by stepwise regression with AIC as the criterion was executed to finally identify the variables used for modeling. The model's discriminative ability was assessed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and its calibration was evaluated through calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemesow test. In addition, decision curve analysis (DCA) was used for clinical net benefit appraisal.

resultsLogistic regression analysis identified nine risk factors for PE, including: maternal age (OR = 1.072, 95%CI = 1.025-1.120), parity(OR = 0.718,95%CI = 0.470-1.060), pre-pregnancy BMI (OR = 2.842,95%CI = 1.957-4.106), family hypertension history (OR = 3.604,95%CI = 2.433-5.264), pregestational diabetes mellitus(PGDM) (OR = 8.399, 95%CI = 4.138-15.883), pregnancy complicating nephropathy (OR = 7.931, 95% CI = 2.584-20.258),pregnancy complicating immune system disorders (OR = 3.134, 95% CI = 1.624-5.525), mean arterial pressure(MAP) at 11-13 + 6 gestational weeks (OR = 1.098, 95% CI = 1.078-1.119) and PIGF (OR = 0.647, 95% CI = 0.448-0.927) at 13-20 + 6 gestational weeks (P < 0.05). The restricted spline regression analysis (RCS) analysis results showed that PIGF and the risk of PE presented an approximately "L-shaped" relationship, with the risk of PE rising sharply with the decrease of PIGF when PIGF < 90 pg/ml, and little change with the increase of PIGF when PIGF > 90 pg/ml. A risk prediction model for PE during the first and second trimester was constructed based on the above selected 11 factors. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the model was 0.781(95%CI = 0.709-0.853), and the sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off value (threshold probability) were 0.571 and 0.879 respectively. Chi-square of 9.616 and P value of 0.293 from Hosmer-Lemeshow test indicated that the model was well calibrated. Finally, the model showed good clinical net benefits in the threshold range of 0.03-0.3.

conclusionThe incidence of PE was associated with maternal age, pre-pregnancy weight and BMI, family hypertension history, PGDM, pregnancy complicating nephropathy, gestational complicating immune system disorders, blood pressure (systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure) at 11-13 + 6 gestational weeks, and PIGF at 13-20 + 6 gestational weeks. When PIGF < 90 pg/ml at 13-20 + 6 gestational week, the risk of PE increased significantly with the reduction of PIGF. The nomogram based on the above results was simpler and more practical in clinical application for PE predicting during the first and second trimester, and may provide an important reference for doctors and patients.

Indexed as

Medical History TakingPre-EclampsiaPregnancy Trimester, FirstAdultFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaternal AgePlacenta Growth FactorPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, SecondRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurvePlacenta Growth FactorMedical historyMultivariate logistic regressionNomogramPreeclampsia prediction modelThe first and second trimester

Identifiers

PMID40426100
PMCPMC12107935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.