ArticleBMC public health2025
Prevalence and prevention of violence against children and adolescents in volunteer work: analysis of a sub-sample from a representative survey of Germany.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViolence against children and adolescents, including physical, emotional, and sexual maltreatment as well as neglect, is a global issue that has long-term consequences. This violence can occur in various institutions, including children and youth clubs (CACs), where proximity to children may be exploited. Although some studies have documented violence in CACs (VCAC), its full extent often remains unrecognized. Despite ongoing prevention efforts, data on the successful implementation of those efforts are lacking. Since protection of VCAC and support of those affected is crucial, this study aimed to determine VCAC prevalence rates, the frequency of measures for protecting children and adolescents from VCAC as well as supporting them, and their relationship to feelings of safety in a German sample.
methodsFrom October 2023 to March 2024, a representative sample of 2,513 people aged 16 years and older in Germany was surveyed. The survey collected sociodemographic information and details on voluntary activities in CACs, focusing on experiences with VCAC and safeguarding measures. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the sample and VCAC prevalence, regressions were used to examine perceptions of protective measures and subjective well-being. The study adhered to ethical guidelines and was approved by the University of Leipzig's Ethics Committee.
resultsAmong 954 respondents which were active in CACs 819 were looked after as child/adolescent, of those 8.42% experienced VCAC - 6.22% emotional, 5.74% physical, and 1.10% sexual violence. The most common protective measures included discussions about violence (42.49%) and complaint procedures (29.06%). Experience with VCAC were negative associated with perceived protective measures and subjective well-being. Subjective well-being was positive associated with VCAC taken seriously in the CACs.
conclusionsThese findings highlight the importance of CACs for the development of children and adolescents. However, 7% of people involved in CACs experience at least one form of VCAC, which indicates that there is still room for improvement in the protection of children and adolescents. Furthermore, existing prevention measures are often still insufficiently known, which points to a communication gap. This finding highlights the importance of mandatory safeguarding measures and better training for volunteers to effectively safeguard children and adolescents in CACs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.