ArticleMolecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
Genetic heterogeneity in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueduct and Pendred syndrome.
Article in Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ZBTB16/CUL3/ROC1 ubiquitin ligase drives the degradation of pathogenic pendrin (SLC26A4) protein variants.Journal of biomedical science · 2026Article
- A UniqueInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Genetic and Environmental Factors Shaping Hearing Loss: Xenobiotics, Mechanisms and Translational Perspectives.Journal of xenobiotics · 2026Review
- Novel SLC26A4 variant in Pendred syndrome with non-classical inheritance: a case report.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Editorial: Pathobiological defects in sensorineural hearing loss: from identification to rescue.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPathogenic variants in the SLC26A4 gene, encoding for Cl
methodsTo determine the genetic etiology, Sanger sequencing, WES and KASP genotyping assay were used. Functional characterization of SLC26A4 variants c.140G>A (p.R47Q), c.415G>A (p.G139R), c.441G>A (p.M147I), c.481T>A (p.F161I), c.1589A>C (p.Y530S) and c.2260del (p.D754Ifs*5) involved determination of iodide influx, total and plasma membrane pendrin expression level and subcellular localization of pendrin by confocal imaging. The nanopore sequencing of nasopharyngeal swab samples was performed to confirm the pathogenic effect of potential splice site variant c.415G>A.
resultsBiallelic variants in the SLC26A4 gene (M2 genotype) were identified in ten probands and a complete CEVA haplotype was confirmed in three probands harbouring SLC26A4 monoallelic variants (M1 genotype). Fifteen variants in the SLC26A4 gene were identified in total, three of which are novel. The functional characterization of the novel variants and variants which were not yet functionally characterized confirmed the pathogenic potential of five out of six tested variants (p.G139R, p.M147I, p.Y530S, p.D754Ifs*5, and p.F161I). Analysis of nasopharyngeal swab samples confirmed exon 4 skipping due to novel variant SLC26A4:c.415G>A. Probands with biallelic SLC26A4 variants had significantly larger thyroid volume per m
conclusionsThe genetic aetiology was determined in 13 out of 37 probands (35%), seven manifested with PDS and six with NSEVA. The present study highlights the importance of functional testing to confirm the pathogenicity of SLC26A4 variants and the phenotype-genotype correlation in SLC26A4-related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.