Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40426041›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

A probabilistic approach to visualize the effect of missing data on PCA in ancient human genomics.

Susanne Zabel, Samira Breitling, Cosimo Posth, Kay Nieselt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Susanne ZabelInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. susanne.zabel@uni-tuebingen.de.
Samira BreitlingInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Cosimo PosthArchaeo- and Palaeogenetics, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Hölderlinstraße 12, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Kay NieseltInstitute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany 16DHBKI086Leibniz ScienceCampus "Geogenomic Archaeology Campus Tübingen (GACT)" W73/2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) is widely used in population genetics to visualize genetic relationships and population structures. In ancient genomics, genotype information may in parts remain unresolved due to the low abundance and degraded quality of ancient DNA. While methods like SmartPCA allow the projection of ancient samples despite missing data, they do not quantify projection uncertainty. The reliability of PCA projections for often very sparse ancient genotype samples is not well understood. Ignoring this uncertainty may lead to overconfident conclusions about the observed genetic relationships and population structure.

resultsThis study systematically investigates the impact of missing loci on PCA projections using both simulated and real ancient human genotype data. Through extensive simulations with high-coverage ancient samples, we demonstrate that increasing levels of missing data can lead to less accurate SmartPCA projections, highlighting the importance of considering uncertainty when interpreting PCA results from ancient samples. To address this, we developed a probabilistic framework to quantify the uncertainty in PCA projections due to missing data. By applying our methodology to modern and ancient West Eurasian genotype samples from the Allen Ancient DNA Resource database, we could show a high concordance between our predicted projection and empirically derived distributions. Applying this framework to real-world data, we demonstrate its utility in predicting and visualizing embedding uncertainties for ancient samples of varying SNP coverages.

conclusionOur results emphasize the importance of accounting for projection uncertainty in ancient population studies. We therefore make our probabilistic model available through TrustPCA, a user-friendly web tool that provides researchers with uncertainty estimates alongside PCA projections, facilitating data exploration in ancient human genomic studies and enhancing transparency in data quality reporting.

Indexed as

DNA, AncientGenome, HumanGenomicsPrincipal Component AnalysisGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDNA, AncientAncient genomicsMissing dataPopulation geneticsPrincipal component analysisSmartPCAUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40426041
PMCPMC12108005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.