ArticleBMC genomics2025
A probabilistic approach to visualize the effect of missing data on PCA in ancient human genomics.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic insights into ancestry and infectious disease in 17th-century colonial Brazil.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrincipal Component Analysis (PCA) is widely used in population genetics to visualize genetic relationships and population structures. In ancient genomics, genotype information may in parts remain unresolved due to the low abundance and degraded quality of ancient DNA. While methods like SmartPCA allow the projection of ancient samples despite missing data, they do not quantify projection uncertainty. The reliability of PCA projections for often very sparse ancient genotype samples is not well understood. Ignoring this uncertainty may lead to overconfident conclusions about the observed genetic relationships and population structure.
resultsThis study systematically investigates the impact of missing loci on PCA projections using both simulated and real ancient human genotype data. Through extensive simulations with high-coverage ancient samples, we demonstrate that increasing levels of missing data can lead to less accurate SmartPCA projections, highlighting the importance of considering uncertainty when interpreting PCA results from ancient samples. To address this, we developed a probabilistic framework to quantify the uncertainty in PCA projections due to missing data. By applying our methodology to modern and ancient West Eurasian genotype samples from the Allen Ancient DNA Resource database, we could show a high concordance between our predicted projection and empirically derived distributions. Applying this framework to real-world data, we demonstrate its utility in predicting and visualizing embedding uncertainties for ancient samples of varying SNP coverages.
conclusionOur results emphasize the importance of accounting for projection uncertainty in ancient population studies. We therefore make our probabilistic model available through TrustPCA, a user-friendly web tool that provides researchers with uncertainty estimates alongside PCA projections, facilitating data exploration in ancient human genomic studies and enhancing transparency in data quality reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.